Battlefield 3 police shooting likely to spark outrage

Ben Parfitt
Battlefield 3 police shooting likely to spark outrage

Modern Warfare 3 has its London Underground level, and now it looks like Battlefield 3 has found its point of controversy.

The game’s listing on the website of American rating’s body the ESRB says that: "In one sequence, a restrained character's throat is slit (off-screen); in another, players shoot police officers to complete a mission objective. The words 'f***' and 's***' can be heard frequently in the dialogue.”

It adds: "The frequent combat is highlighted by realistic gunfire and large explosions; characters sometimes scream and emit large splashes of blood when shot. Players can also engage in hand-to-hand combat: repeatedly punching enemies in the face; stabbing soldiers to death with knives.”

The inclusion of such an event, no matter how justified it may be by the narrative, is almost an invite to the tabloid press.

The Call of Duty series has a particularly impressive track record of courting controversy. 2009’s Modern Warfare 2 included the infamous ‘No Russian’ level in which gamers were able – though not required – to gun down innocent civilians in an airport.

Then earlier this year The Daily Mail got its knickers in a know over the revelation that a level from next month’s Modern Warfare 3 will be set in London and feature a chase scene on the London Underground.


Tags: battlefield 3 , controversy , police

Follow us on

  • RSS

Add a new comment

You need to be logged in to post comments. If you do not have an account then please register.


1 comment

I posted a query to DICE on the BattleLog forums about having an "offensive language" off switch.

I received no reply, other than the obscene rantings of the angry teenage Xbox crowd, who clearly feel a game cannot be purchased unless it has a "parental advisory" sticker and and age rating too high for them to legitimately purchase..

The hypocrisy DICE is showing is absurd, since the game has an identical obscenity filter to BF:BC2, which obscures the same foul language if typed into the game chat!! What's so hard about implementing an off switch? Just make it an option. One we can disable.

Swearing along the lines of "I'm taking it up the ar#e over here!" might impress rude children, but do adults really need this? I for one, don't.
So many other facets of war are excised from the game, so they can hardly complain it affects the "realism". People buy these games for escapism, not realism.

Anthony Hunt

Anthony Hunt INDUSTRY
Oct 11th 2011 at 4:50PM

1 0