Or is it that all those PS3 exclusives are now coming out on 360 as well and thats whats actually happening? Way to spin that one Phil!!

Why do you people keep using that picture of Harrison, it makes him look very sinister, "I'm going to rule the world, yessssss....."

good point mr jolly, thats what i though to when first read.
the major 3rd party are still going to start w/ 360 b/c their dev kits are so much better and easier to work with.

Oh yeah cause i see some great games coming out this christmas for ps3. The graphics are 2x as good as xb.... Yeah right Phil.

Yea he is absolutely right, John Carmack who is known to be vocally outspoken against Sony has even said from a business and programming point starting out on the PS3 and porting the code over to the 360 would be extremely easier than going the other way around.

I believe him. Seriously! 10 cans of stella and a bottle of whiskey, and the guy makes sense! That's why its the leading console. And that its outselling the 360 by 20 to 1. Hang on, just had some coffee, whats this guy on with? seriously?

ok is it me or are game developers more interested in money and making a good game as opposed to which system they can get slightly better graphics out of. at the end of the day sony and microsoft should expect similar games as they have put themselves in a position where its very expensive to make a game for their systems, on top of the fact the ps3 is selling poorly.
the big question is what are you doing to stop people jumping ship to a system that actually sells well (Wii), ........answer nothing! u sit there all deluded in the awe of your shiny doorstop

Well I agree with what he said,

developers arn't bothering at all with PS3 conversions! PS3's Bioshock has been canned? Oh, dear.

Nice to see the 360 fanboys out in force.

How old are you lot?

Amm... Are they ever going to acknowledge that PS3 is a commercial failure? What are they waiting for to cut prices down to sub-$400?

Yea he is absolutely right, John Carmack who is known to be vocally outspoken against Sony has even said from a business and programming point starting out on the PS3 and porting the code over to the 360 would be extremely easier than going the other way around.

Its not PS3 vs 360...its PS3 vs 360/PC With most major releases for the 360 being dual PC releases as well, its no contest as far as market share is concerned. So 5 million PS3s vs 12 million 360s and a billion PCs (more like 100 million as most PCs arnt game worthy) Who are you gonna code for?

You Sony Fanboys are so pathetic... do you really believe your lies?

Will the flame wars ever stop?
The only good thing to come out of this is the fact that its good for gamers, software wise.

I'm afraid all the comments against Sony are right. I've been a dedicated Sony fan (up to PSP but not PS3) and Microsoft has the advantage of easy ports from the PC or other way, using various cross-over dev kits that they're, obviously, very good at producing (I think one is called XNA, right?)

Anyway, Sony are realising that their first gen dev kits for the PS3 were shite and kept third parties out of all the nice tricks their internal studios were able to do. So now, they're going to release all the decent libraries to third parties - but isn't it a bit late now?

Yes, the Revolution (I'm sorry, but I simply cannot bring myself to call it by its ridiculous market name) does have a novel control system and some games are keeping gamers happy but that will not last unless Nintendo garner more support from third parties and this does not seem likely at the moment, which should be their main worry and the worry of every Revolution owner - you can't play Sports forever!

Phil Harrison is premature to say what he's saying here, he doesn't know about every single game that third parties are developing because their NDA with Sony doesn't stretch to every IP they develop. So he's only talking about what he's seeing or perhaps even, what he's been promised, and we all know what can happen to promises, right?

As for David Reeves comments at Leipzig, good God! Is that man seriously on a payroll at Sony?! I mean, to even suggest that they're 'holding back' on game releases because they don't want to "overload the consumers" is RIDICULOUS and STUPID at the same time. All his comments say to me is that Sony has no games to release for this Xmas period, aside from the few disappointments coming out in the next few months and that's it - that's your lot for this year!

I think I'm going to buy myself a Vita-Mix with my £400 instead. It's multifunctional, it's got plenty of recipes to choose from and it gives owners 100% satisfaction guarantee or your money back - now that's something that Sony can only dream of right now...

Oh yeah, great point! One thing though, why don't you name those awesome third party games that are being developed exclusively for the PS3? Just a couple of examples, that's all.

If you want do delete your site from our spam bases - just email us with domain of your site:

abuse-here@inbox.ru

thank you!

Gear up for grub with a tripleheader of pigskin, including a meeting of brothers in Dallas. Everybody knows it's been a rough year for her, but find out who else had issues

The comic visited the land for the first time in decades to promote his anRrpWTYnkmcou new animated movie about bees, and he was treated like royalty literally

Contrary to popular belief, the end of the year is one of the best times to look for, awesome descion