Newsflash Signup

Buy now at Zavvi.com
Activision

ELSPA tells Government: ‘PEGI is the only option’

Bookmark with Social network
ELSPA tells Government: ‘PEGI is the only option’

Jackson says ‘quick-fix BBFC solution’ won’t address the rise of online games

The games industry’s future in online games means that PEGI is the only choice for games classification in the UK, ELSPA head Paul Jackson today told the Government.

Speaking at a special games industry forum held at Westminster, Jackson compared and contrasted the opposing classification bodies – UK-only BBFC and pan-European PEGI – and said that choosing between the two in the wake of the Byron Review was “the single-most important decision to the UK industry has faced in a generation”, and that the Government must choose PEGI.

“The film ratings board works well for films and linear media – but games are not linear and will be less so in future. The internet means it won’t be possible to rate all games played in the UK from a UK-only standpoint,” said Jackson.

“Moving to BBFC ratings would be a step back – they don’t have the expertise to classify games online and offline,” said Jackson.

He explained that video games were on course to become “endlessly customisable” via online and user-generated content, “the key differentiator between games and film.”

Advertisement

And the BBFC has a shaky track record, Jackson added, pointing out that “the film ratings board continually downgrades games rated by PEGI” which can confuse consumers and pose a child safety threat.

“BBFC ratings, and the UK, would regularly be out of step with our European neighbours.”

He added that the BBFC was also “incapable of coping with extra games”.

“We are not talking about a few extra hundred, we are talking about tens of thousands of games and game add-ons that will have to be reviewed every year. That not only puts kids at risk – but it harms the UK industry. Games will undoubtedly be released later.”

So PEGI, Jackson said, “represents the gold standard, will undoubtedly be the best system for tomorrow, and is the only ratings system that offers strongest protection of children.

“PEGI is designed specifically for software and their infinite variations – that is why it is backed by the vast majority of the computer games industry. Only PEGI has online credibility.

“It is also very easily scalable – it is future proof. When we talk about child protection we talk about PEGI. It is the solution for today and the solution for tomorrow.”

Jackson added: “The UK industry wants to work with Government to provide a strong, detailed PEGI awareness strategy. We want to reach not just children, but parents and the wider games playing community.

“We are playing our part,” said Jackson. “But the Government must play its part too. We call on them to recognise the important of the decision they wish to make, that they avoid the quick fix solution.”

For Paul Jackson's comments in full, click here.

To read what the UK bosses of Nintendo, EA, Ubisoft and Sega think of a single-ratings system under PEGI, click here.

lunacy

posted by SvenOf9 Jul 08, 2008 at 10:00 am
1

PEGI is pointless whilst its not backed up by legislation. Thats the BBFCs killer app. If GTA IV was a PEGI 18+ in the UK there is nothing stopping it being sold to a 5 year old in law, is this really what ELSPA is arguing for?

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: lunacy

posted by Jul 08, 2008 at 10:38 am
2

The general public understand BBFC ratings, whereas PEGI ratings they think are the level of difficulty.

Just have BBFC ratings on every game, and problem solved. Some parents don't even care about ratings anyway, as they let their 8 year old watch films like Saw

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: lunacy

posted by adam005 Jul 08, 2008 at 10:39 am
3

I 100% agree Sven.

I wonder if there is any way that PEGI could be backed up by workable legislation in addition to a massive consumer awareness campaign (to ensure the PEGI age-stamps on games have the same impact as BBFC ones already do with those that matter - ie PARENTS). If that was possible, then I would back PEGI, but for now, it strikes me that the BBFC age-ratings logos work far better.

Also, ELSPA continually criticising the BBFC for not understanding (or being 'ready for') online or for not having the resources to cope with the increased workload etc etc. is really wearing a bit thin. It is only making me think that ELSPA is too interested in protecting its own (publishers, PEGI) and not interested enough in the more important matters at stake here (stopping children buying adult games).

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: Re: lunacy

posted by SvenOf9 Jul 08, 2008 at 11:40 pm
4

To be honest I don't think the PEGI system is remotely suitable for use in the UK, and therefore probably anywhere in europe - that series of symbols for content is ridiculous.Frankly I would be more interested in getting something like the BBFC ratings system developed for worldwide use - i dont like censorship as a matter of principal - but there should be a legal framework in place for titles such as Condemned 2, GTA IV and Manhunt 2 to make it clear it i a criminal offence to supply such material to a minor. Its just common sense!

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Leave a Comment

Activision
MCV

ABOUT US

MCV is the leading trade news and community site for all professionals working within the UK and international video games market. It reaches everyone from store manager to CEO, covering the entire industry. MCV is published by Intent Media, which specialises in entertainment, leisure and technology markets

Intent media, Company number 03641099