Newsflash Signup

Buy now at Zavvi.com
Sega Sonic

Is this the real reason why gamers "risk death"?

Bookmark with Social network
Is this the real reason why gamers

Industry forgotten by Change4Life’s commercial arm – as junk food and TV giants influence Government campaign

It’s been on the lips of every publisher boss this week: “How could that Change4Life ad have been avoided?”

MCV may finally have the answer today, in the shape of Business4Life; a group of corporate entities which have pledged a £200 million in-kind contribution to support Change4Life through marketing, branding and advertising activity.

The coalition’s members have been granted influence on the editorial direction of the campaign by the Department of Health – but not a single games firm has been invited or asked to donate.

Confectionery firms that have signed up include Coca-Cola, Cadbury’s, Mars, Nestle and PepsiCo – the owner of Walker’s Crisps. TV companies that sit on the Board include BSkyB, Channel 4, five, ITV, Virgin Media and Viacom.

The latest Change4Life print ad – which shows a young gamer under the words ‘Risk an early DEATH. Just do nothing’ – has attracted widespread criticism from the industry for ignoring TV and fast food’s role in the UK’s obesity crisis.

Advertisement

Marketing director of Business4Life Jane Holdsworth has encouraged the industry to get involved – and expressed regret that no games publisher has yet signed up.

“It’s a shame – a combination of us not having contacts and games companies not coming forward,” she told MCV. “We would be delighted to have the games industry involved in future. Our members meet regularly with the Department Of Health, and are given opportunity to express opinions about upcoming campaigns – which helps avoid nasty surprises.”

Surprisingly, Holdsworth added her voice to those that have criticised the new ad. She added: “It’s irrational and grossly unfair to pick on a single product like that. I’m surprised, because the Department of Health’s own research shows negative advertising is not effective.”

Nintendo has told MCV that it is now keen to open discussions with Business4Life.

Not having contacts?!

posted by DTH Mar 12, 2009 at 10:15 am
1
DTH

Really? Is it THAT hard to find the email or phone number of a game company representative? Crikey...

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Don't think we're there yet

posted by Mark Brendan Mar 12, 2009 at 10:22 am
2
Mark Brendan

I would say that *could* be benificial in future, but I'm highly skeptical given that the government stand by the advert and haven't admitted it was a mistake, apologised and withdrawn it.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

We win!

posted by beemoh Mar 12, 2009 at 10:23 am
3
beemoh

Didn't somebody predict this in the comments thread on the original article?

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Well done.

posted by techgamer Mar 12, 2009 at 10:32 am
4

Michael Moore would be proud.

  • + 1 
  • - 0 
  • 1

an appalling common denominator

posted by oiyeah Mar 12, 2009 at 10:36 am
5

Am I being overly negative in suggesting this government sanctioned, business funded campaign is once again about money?

the audacity of the corporations involved to protect their business from any negative connotations by shovling a few quid in to a "health" campign is sick

there are alomost all of the 7 deadly sins at work here, it's disgusting

I'd suggest the video games companies stay away - do we realy want to support what they (B4L) are doing in the way they are doing it?

The UK public on the whole change their minds on a daily basis about who they want to run the country, so why spend so much negative energy on this blink in time

We have some great healthy products to sell, most of the other companies involved can't say that. Can we for once not act as sheep and get drawn into something that is fundametally flawed - let us plough our own carefully seeded furrow, and do it right.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Change4Life

posted by fred hasson Mar 12, 2009 at 10:36 am
6
fred hasson

MCV - You have exposed the measure of this government's ways of doing business - its not edifying - look at what they did in cahoots with the banking sector!

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Business4Life

posted by Gryzor Mar 12, 2009 at 10:56 am
7
Gryzor

Basically, this translates to:

"No matter how bad an influence your product may or may not have on people's health - we won't mention it, if you just help funding our campaign."

This reeks of hypocrisy and puts what's in the best interest of bribers way above actually sending a meaningful and healthy message in a - wait for it - GOVERNMENT-campaign :-S

It makes the whole campaign utterly pointless, downright appalling and disgusting. But sure enough, Ninty already aims to play along these pathetic rules and intends to part with some serious cash.

I wonder whom they'll start to blame, once every possible scapegoat has coughed up some campaign money.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Is it just me...

posted by FGL Mar 12, 2009 at 10:57 am
8
FGL

or does it just seem wrong to have those companies sponsoring a health kick? Like Heckler & Koch getting behind the US anti-gun campaign. Even in these tight times money still talks I guess.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: Is it just me...

posted by ben Mar 12, 2009 at 12:24 pm
9
ben

At least the games indsutry can calim to have turned a generation into skaters from the tony hawks series!
I think skateboarding keeps people fit, most people who buy the fifa games play football outside as well.

The wii can be used to promote fitness.
It sucks to think that because no cash in hand was paid, one side gets slated.

fatty foods hurt more, its what people eat while playing games :O

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: Re: Is it just me...

posted by cypher Mar 12, 2009 at 8:44 pm
10
cypher

To be honest, asides games using ONE possible activity that a child could do whilst sitting down... Is there any actual link between gaming and ill-health?

To me it seems that this isnt actually anything to do with the games industry, asides being the latest scapegoat.
Eating unhealthily and being inactive, yes... Sitting down to do something, no... Why has noone blamed book publishers, newspapers, boardgames.. SCHOOL... etc?

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Re: Re: Is it just me...

posted by The Truth Exposed Mar 12, 2009 at 9:50 pm
11
The Truth Exposed

No contacts? That's bull****. Viacom full well have contacts and I find it hard to believe that the others don't either. I hate to play conspiracy theory, but I can't help but get the feeling that the TV companies deliberately sought to keep the games companies out of it because of the damage that key demographics shifting over to the platform is reaking upon their advertising revenues (Amongst other things of course). They know full well if they can damage public perception of gaming, they might just be able to stem some of the loss of viewers and advertising.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Oh dear

posted by An Boat Mar 15, 2009 at 1:50 pm
12
An Boat

This operation sounds strikingly similar to how a Mafia style protection agency works, pay us or we'll smash your store, translates to, pay us or we'll black label your industry.

These kind of reports also seem to aim to absolve parents of responsibility for their child's lifestyle and focus the blame on companies for selling products and services that aren't healthy, surely moderation is the key to enjoying these less healthy activities without ballooning into couch bound hippo.

  • + 0 
  • - 0 
  • 0

Leave a Comment

Sega Sonic
MCV

ABOUT US

MCV is the leading trade news and community site for all professionals working within the UK and international video games market. It reaches everyone from store manager to CEO, covering the entire industry. MCV is published by Intent Media, which specialises in entertainment, leisure and technology markets

Intent media, Company number 03641099